#3
Monthly Rank
#3
Lifetime Rank
Share
10 September 2026
UnCopyright

UnCopyright

From AI Creation History to a Defensible Copyright Claim.

Gursimar KaurGitHubWebsiteVideo
Open Source

Gallery

About the Project

UnCopyright

AI helped create it. But what makes it your work?

That is where an AI-assisted copyright claim gets difficult.

A work may begin with a human idea, move through prompts and AI-generated versions, and end with selection, rearrangement and manual edits. But when the work is challenged, the final file rarely tells that story.

The legal question becomes much more specific:

What did the human contribute? What evidence shows that they contributed it? And does that contribution matter under the applicable copyright law?

The Problem

This is not just a theoretical problem. In the United States, the U.S. Copyright Office has emphasised that copyright protection for AI-assisted outputs depends on sufficient human contribution, and received more than 10,000 comments in its AI inquiry. (U.S. Copyright Office)

India is confronting the same question directly. In its recent DABUS decision, the Indian Copyright Office held that AI cannot be the author of a work, reinforcing the need to identify the human contribution and authorship behind AI-assisted creation. (Copyright Office, Government of India)

I faced the same problem: when working with AI-assisted creation, it was easy to produce the final work—but much harder to reconstruct and demonstrate exactly how the human contribution shaped it.

That is where UnCopyright begins.

UnCopyright

UnCopyright works backwards from the finished work.

It reconstructs the creation history—capturing what happened at each stage, separating human contribution from AI generation, and linking those events to the evidence behind them.

Then it puts that history through jurisdiction-specific copyright analysis for:

India · United States · United Kingdom

Every conclusion follows:

Fact → Rule → Authority → Application → Conclusion

And every material fact carries a status:

Known · Inferred · Unknown

So if the evidence doesn't establish something, UnCopyright doesn't pretend that it does.

What Does That Give You?

Not a percentage of “human authorship.”

Not a yes/no copyright button.

A Claim Matrix.

It shows which human contributions may support a claim, what evidence supports them, what the law says about them, and where the record is still incomplete.

Creation Event → Evidence → Legal Issue → Authority → Claim

The entire chain remains traceable.

UnCopyright also generates a structured summary of the complete analysis, including the creation history, evidence, legal issues, authorities and Claim Matrix. At the end, the analysis can be exported as a PDF, giving an advocate or legal professional a consolidated document that they can review, verify and use as a starting point for further legal assessment.

Why Start With the Creation?

Because two works can look identical at the end and still have very different creation histories.

One may contain substantial human selection and modification.

Another may be almost entirely generated by AI.

The final output alone may not tell you which is which.

UnCopyright doesn't try to guess. It reconstructs the workflow.

Built for the Question Lawyers Actually Have

When AI is involved, the question isn't simply:

“Was AI used?”

It is:

“What, exactly, can this person claim as their contribution—and what can they prove?”

UnCopyright gives that question a structured evidentiary and legal trail.

No invented facts. No arbitrary percentages. No silent assumptions.

Just the creation history, the evidence, and the law.

Proposed Reform Warning

Copyright law around AI is still evolving.

Where a jurisdiction has proposed legislation, regulatory changes, policy reforms or other developments that may alter the applicable legal position, UnCopyright flags them as a Proposed Reform Warning.

This helps distinguish between:

What the law says today → What may change → What that change could mean for the claim

The warning does not treat a proposed reform as current law.

It simply ensures that an advocate reviewing the analysis knows when the legal position may be subject to change.

Available Wherever You Work

UnCopyright is designed to fit into the way legal and creative work already happens.

Use it on your laptop or mobile, so the creation history and analysis can be accessed wherever the work takes place.

The Work Is the End of the Process.

For copyright analysis, UnCopyright starts at the beginning.

UnCopyright From AI Creation History to a Defensible Copyright Claim.

Practice Areas

Key Features

1. Creation History Reconstruction

Reconstructs the journey from the initial idea and prompts to AI outputs, human edits, and the final work.

2. Human–AI Contribution Mapping

Separates AI-generated content from the human’s creative contributions, selections, modifications, and arrangements.

3. Evidence Trail

Links each creation event and claimed human contribution to the evidence supporting it.

4. Jurisdiction-Specific Legal Analysis

Analyses the work under applicable copyright law across India, United States, and United Kingdom.

5. Claim Matrix

Maps Creation Event → Evidence → Legal Issue → Authority → Claim to show what may support the copyright claim.

6. Fact Status Tracking

Classifies material facts as Known · Inferred · Unknown, making evidentiary gaps transparent.

7. Proposed Reform Warning

Flags proposed legislative, regulatory, or policy changes that may affect the current copyright position.

8. Advocate-Ready PDF Report

Generates a complete summary of the creation history, evidence, legal analysis, authorities, and Claim Matrix for advocate review.

9. Cross-Platform Access

Available across laptop and mobile, so the analysis can be accessed wherever needed.

About the Creator

GK
Gursimar Kaur
Student at Indian Institute of Management Rohtak (B.B.A. LL.B)
LinkedIn