Legal AI has learned to summarise, but I am not sure it has learned how lawyers think. Most legal AI tools make summarising, retrieving and drafting faster, whereas the real craft of law lies in judgment, i.e. reading, identifying what matters, spotting contradictions and connecting facts to the argument they shape.
With that idea, I built "May or Shall". It is a Chrome extension, a website, a desktop app for Windows and Mac and an app inside ChatGPT, which allows a person to read, highlight the lines that matter and tag them under a heading, with every line keeping its source, i.e. the page and the paragraph it came from. Those lines can then be linked across documents, so that a paragraph of a plaint can be connected to the exhibit that proves it, and ChatGPT drafts from them through the May or Shall app.
The human in the loop can also be at the start of the task instead of just the end. The judgment stays with the person who read the document and only the typing moves, and every sentence of the draft can be checked against the line it came from. I am a lawyer and I built it with Claude Code.