In an IP or software dispute the evidence is usually on the other side's website, and the moment they receive a letter before action they are on notice. Pages get edited, repos go private, the wording you relied on is quietly rewritten, and by disclosure it is your word against a dead link. A screenshot does not help: it has no date, no integrity, and opposing counsel can say you faked it, because anyone can.
Lawyers already reach for the Wayback Machine, and Exhibit A uses it too, but on its own it is not enough. You save the page you think matters, yet relevance in litigation is usually clear only in hindsight: the page nobody flagged turns out to be the one that counts, and if it was never saved it is gone, leaving you to guess in advance what will matter. Its snapshot also lives on archive.org, a copy you point at rather than one you hold and control.
Exhibit A removes the guesswork. Paste a URL and in one step it captures the entire website, bundles it into a single file you keep and can reopen and click through offline exactly as it looked, and seals it with cryptographic hashes and an independent trusted timestamp. It still files each page with the Wayback Machine, but as one corroborating layer rather than something you rely on. The result is a record you can hand to the other side, an expert, or the court, and they can verify it themselves, with standard tools, without having to trust you. Preserve first, send the letter second.
It follows the documentation principles of ISO/IEC 27037:2012, the international standard for identifying, collecting, acquiring and preserving digital evidence, so each capture carries the method, environment, timestamps, hashes and chain-of-custody detail that preservation calls for, in a form a non-specialist can produce in one click, and free.
Usable the moment you open it. It reads only the public web pages you point it at and stores nothing sensitive about you or your clients, so there is no confidentiality or privilege exposure to clear, and it needs no integration with your DMS, case management or any other system. It is at its best on the kind of site that usually matters in a dispute, a single page or a small brochure site, captured completely. Larger sites are on the roadmap; for now it does the focused, high-value job well rather than claiming to swallow the whole web.